Practical application of opt-out recruitment methods in two health services research studies
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Participant recruitment is an ongoing challenge in health research. Recruitment may be especially difficult for studies of access to health care because, even among those who are in care, people using services least often also may be hardest to contact and recruit. Opt-out recruitment methods (in which potential participants are given the opportunity to decline further contact about the study (opt out) following an initial mailing, and are then contacted directly if they have not opted out within a specified period) can be used for such studies. However, there is a dearth of literature on the effort needed for effective opt-out recruitment. METHODS In this paper we describe opt-out recruitment procedures for two studies on access to health care within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. We report resource requirements for recruitment efforts (number of opt-out packets mailed and number of phone calls made). We also compare the characteristics of study participants to potential participants via t-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and chi-squared tests. RESULTS Recruitment rates for our two studies were 12 and 21%, respectively. Across multiple study sites, we had to send between 4.3 and 9.2 opt-out packets to recruit one participant. The number of phone calls required to arrive at a final status for each potentially eligible Veteran (i.e. study participation or the termination of recruitment efforts) were 2.9 and 6.1 in the two studies, respectively. Study participants differed as expected from the population of potentially eligible Veterans based on planned oversampling of certain subpopulations. The final samples of participants did not differ statistically from those who were mailed opt-out packets, with one exception: in one of our two studies, participants had higher rates of mental health service use in the past year than did those mailed opt-out packets (64 vs. 47%). CONCLUSIONS Our results emphasize the practicality of using opt-out methods for studies of access to health care. Despite the benefits of these methods, opt-out alone may be insufficient to eliminate non-response bias on key variables. Researchers will need to balance considerations of sample representativeness and feasibility when designing studies investigating access to care.
منابع مشابه
Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of ‘opt in’ versus ‘opt out’ approaches
BACKGROUND Although in health services survey research we strive for a high response rate, this must be balanced against the need to recruit participants ethically and considerately, particularly in surveys with a sensitive nature. In survey research there are no established recommendations to guide recruitment approach and an 'opt-in' system that requires potential participants to request a co...
متن کاملRecruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of opt-in compared with opt-out recruitment strategies on response rate and selection bias. DESIGN Double blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING Two general practices in England. PARTICIPANTS 510 patients with angina. INTERVENTION Patients were randomly allocated to an opt-in (asked to actively signal willingness to participate in research) or opt-ou...
متن کاملThe Relationship between Nurses’ Organizational Commitment and Services Quality
Background: Organizational commitment and its significant impact on the job satisfaction and performance has been the subject of many studies. Regarding the importance of organizational behavior and its role in service quality, the purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between nurses’ organizational commitment and hospital services in order to improve its qu...
متن کاملOptimising participation and generalisability: the use of opt-out recruitment for an implementation trial in primary care
Action to Support Practices Implementing Research Evidence (ASPIRE) is an NIHR-funded programme aiming to develop and evaluate interventions to promote the uptake of NICE recommendations in general practice. Multifaceted intervention packages targeting key recommendations will be evaluated using anonymised, routinely collected electronic health records in two parallel cluster randomised control...
متن کاملResearch ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
OBJECTIVE Randomised controlled trials, a gold-standard approach to reduce uncertainties in clinical practice, are growing in cost and are often slow to recruit. We determined whether methodological approaches to facilitate large, efficient clinical trials were acceptable to UK research ethics committees (RECs). DESIGN We developed a protocol in collaboration with parents, for a comparative-e...
متن کامل